The Trick of Personal Responibility

I think the argument to pay higher wages is a trick that actually makes people worse off because it shifts the balance of society towards greater personal responibility. This sounds like a positive step but where previously there was collective responsibility in that taxes were paid and spent in ways that benefitted the country, personal responsibility is a way for people to pay less tax for the benefit of themselves. 

Problem one is fewer people acting in ways that benefit the country.

Problem two is that people need higher wages to pay for those things that have now become their personal responibility.

And that is the trick. People are given back less than they gain, and told asking for more will be inflationary. Meanwhile, somebody else pockets the difference, either for their own greed, or to delay the collapse of capitalism a little longer in a void of ideas for a better system.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Farm Labour is not for Locals

Image
The economics for people to take a job as a Farm Picker just don't work if you live in a wealthy country like the UK. It's expensive to live here. Property is expensive. Rents are high. These and the high cost of living means seasonal work doesn't cover the months where there is no work. On top of that the cost of transport means low paid work in remote areas takes a big piece of whatever you earn. You're unlikely to be able to move closer as you will have family commitments or a partner working elsewhere, and you won't be making enough to have two homes. On the other hand, for people who live in countries where property is cheap and rents are low you can make a good income by working here for the picking season. Temporary accommodation only has to be paid for during the season you are here. Farms can provide this nearby. And after the picking season you can take several months off back in your own country, where the weather is warmer and what would be a
Read more

50% Pension at 60

Instead of making working less an, 'either/or', argument it should be made an, 'at what age', argument. Work 5 days, or 6 when you are young and fit, work 60 or 70 hour weeks, but don't be expected to keep this up in your 50s and 60s, especially if you are in a physical job. You could even tie this to years spent claiming Benefits, as an incentive to get young people into a work ethic. You only get to complain about the retirement age if you've been working all the years up to retirement. And in a way, we are working less already, by living longer when we retire. I would take things a step further and let people be eligible for a 50% pension at age 60 or so. This would allow them to slow down a little before fully retiring. They could afford to drop a day or more, opening up opportunities for younger people to advance in the workplace, while still keeping their years of experience on tap for the employer. I think people doing well paid work they enjoy are too c
Read more

notacoward, Entrepreneurship

Entrepreneurship is like one of those carnival games where you throw darts or something. Middle class kids can afford one throw. Most miss. A few hit the target and get a small prize. A very few hit the center bullseye and get a bigger prize. Rags to Riches! The American Dream lives on. Rich kids can afford many throws. If they want to, they can try over and over again until they hit something and feel good about themselves. Some keep going until they hit the center bullseye, then they give speeches or write blog posts about "meritocracy" and the salutary effects of hard work. Poor kids aren't visiting the carnival. They're the ones working on it. Credit:notacoward on Nov 9 2017
Read more